Skip to main content

Table 3 Contingency table of court judgments using specific technology (left) versus decision (top) (\(\chi ^2(2)=3.09, p=0.213\), Cramer’s V=\(0.05, p=0.21\), \(\alpha =0.01\))

From: Going dark? Analysing the impact of end-to-end encryption on the outcome of Dutch criminal court cases

Judgments

Convicted

Acquitted

Total

Row

Column (%)

WhatsApp

405

22

427

 

94.8%

5.2%

100.0%

33.3

PGP

397

28

425

 

93.4%

6.6%

100.0%

33.2

Comparison

395

35

430

 

91.9%

8.1%

100.0%

33.5

Total

1,197

85

1,282

 

93.4%

6.6%

100.0%

100.0