Table 2 Contingency table of court judgments using specific technology (left) versus special power used by law enforcement (top) (\(\chi ^2(6)=336.31, p<0.001\), Cramer’s V\(=0.35, p<0.001\), \(\alpha =0.01\), and for the table without the first column with a zero cell count: \(\chi ^2(4)=94.73, p<0.001\), Cramer’s V\(=0.30, p<0.001\), \(\alpha =0.01\)). Boldface percentages are discussed in the text
Judgments | No | Tapped | Readout | Located | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Special | Only | w/ or w/o | w/ or w/o | Row | Column (%) | |
Power | Tapped | Tapped, readout | ||||
177 | 153 | 85 | 22 | 437 | ||
40.5% | 35.0% | 19.5% | 5.0% | 100.0% | 32.5 | |
PGP | 87 | 145 | 123 | 84 | 439 | |
19.8% | 33.0% | 28.0% | 19.1% | 100.0% | 32.6 | |
Comparison | 0 | 338 | 91 | 40 | 469 | |
0.0% | 72.1% | 19.4% | 8.5% | 100.0% | 34.9 | |
Total | 264 | 636 | 299 | 146 | 1,345 | |
19.6% | 47.3% | 22.2% | 10.9% | 100.0% | 100.0 | |