Table 1 Contingency table of court judgments using specific technology (left) versus offence type (top) (\(\chi ^2(10)=350.48, p<0.001\), Cramer’s V\(=0.36, p<0.001\), \(\alpha =0.01\)). Boldface percentages are discussed in the text
Judgments | Property | Violent | Public order | Drug | Weapon | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Offence | Offence | Offence | Offence | Offence | Offence | Row | Column (%) | |
119 | 182 | 39 | 41 | 11 | 45 | 437 | ||
27.2% | 41.6% | 8.9% | 9.4% | 2.5% | 10.3% | 100% | 32.5 | |
PGP | 30 | 60 | 50 | 233 | 12 | 54 | 439 | |
6.8% | 13.7% | 11.4% | 53.1% | 2.7% | 12.3% | 100% | 32.6 | |
Comparison | 122 | 116 | 41 | 69 | 12 | 109 | 469 | |
26.0% | 24.7% | 8.7% | 14.7% | 2.6% | 23.2% | 100% | 34.9 | |
Total | 271 | 358 | 130 | 343 | 35 | 208 | 1,345 | |
20.1% | 26.6% | 9.7% | 25.5% | 2.6% | 15.5% | 100.0% | 100.0 | |
Hartel et al. (2022) | 27.9% | 31.6% | 9.7% | 12.1% | 3.1% | 15.6% | ||