Table 3 Ranked models including all variables for commercial robbery
From: An information theory approach to hypothesis testing in criminological research
Models | AICc | ΔAIC | Relative likelihood of the model | Akaike weights | How much better is the first model compared to the competing models? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Discretionary + ordinary + SL | 1118.96 | 0 | 1 | 0.78 |  |
Ordinary + SL | 1121.73 | 2.77 | 0.25 | 0.2 | 3.99 |
Ordinary + age + SL | 1125.8 | 6.84 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 30.53 |
Discretionary +SL | 1161 | 42.04 | 0 | 0 | – |
Discretionary + age + SL | 1165.13 | 46.16 | – | – | – |
Discretionary + ordinary | 1165.21 | 46.25 | – | – | – |
Spatial lag | 1168 | 49.04 | – | – | – |
Ordinary | 1174.16 | 55.2 | – | – | – |
Ordinary + age | 1178.24 | 59.28 | – | – | – |
Discretionary | 1217.48 | 98.52 | – | – | – |
Discretionary + age | 1221.03 | 102.06 | – | – | – |
Age + social disadvantage | 1224.03 | 105.07 | – | – | – |
Social disadvantage | 1224.28 | 105.32 | – | – | – |
Intercept-only | 1228.99 | 110.03 | – | – | – |
Age | 1231.57 | 112.61 | – | – | – |