Skip to main content

Table 2 Bivariate analyses between guardianship, modus operandi, locations, and the type of sexual murderer

From: An application of CRAVED to the choice of victim in sexual homicide: a routine activity approach

Variables

Sexual murderers of children (n = 79)

Sexual murderers of adults (n = 271)

Phi, Cramer’s V, F

Concealable

Forensic awareness

44.3 (35)

46.1 (125)

0.02

Used restraints/gags

11.4 (9)

15.9 (43)

0.05

Body moved

34.2 (27)

33.9 (92)

−0.002

Concealed body

31.6 (25)

37.3 (101

0.05

Unsolved

19.0 (15)

33.2 (82)

0.13**

Number of days to recover bodya

140.53 (754.55)

50.85 (156.60)

3.36

Removable

Victim build is thin

49.4 (39)

29.9 (81)

0.20***

Victim abuses alcohol/drugs

31.6 (25)

49.1 (133)

0.15**

Body recovery—residence

11.4 (9)

26.6 (72)

0.15**

Weapon used

58.2 (46)

52.8 (143)

−0.05

Available

Victim at home

35.4 (28)

25.5 (69)

−0.09*

Victim living with adult

96.2 (76)

56.1 (152)

−0.35***

Victim outside on the street

55.7 (44)

26.6 (72)

−0.26***

Victim at recreational activities

19.0 (15)

26.9 (73)

0.07

Con approach

44.3 (35)

39.5 (107)

−0.04

Contact location—residence

31.6 (25)

26.2 (71)

−0.05

Offense location—residence

21.5 (17)

29.2 (79)

0.07

Valuable

Victim is a child

Enjoyable

Vaginal sex

44.3 (35)

46.9 (127)

0.02

Anal sex

20.3 (16)

15.1 (41)

−0.06

Beating

59.5 (47)

43.5 (118)

−0.13**

Disposable

Victim is stranger

24.1 (19)

26.2 (71)

0.02

Stabbing

15.2 (12)

22.9 (62)

0.08

COD is strangulation

35.4 (28)

24.0 (65)

−0.11*

  1. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
  2. p < 0.10
  3. aMeans are reported with the standard deviation in parentheses