|
Model 1*
|
Model 2
†
|
Model 3
§
|
---|
| Unadjusted | Adjusted | Unadjusted | Adjusted | Unadjusted | Adjusted |
---|
| RR (95% CL) | RR (95% CL) | RR (95% CL) | RR (95% CL) | RR (95% CL) | RR (95% CL) |
---|
Variables
| | | | | | |
Cameras installed | 0.22 (0.10, 0.52) | 0.11 (0.06, 0.24) | 0.31 (0.14, 0.72) | 0.32 (0.15, 0.67) | — | — |
Partitions installed | — | — | — | — | 1.11 (0.59, 2.09) | 0.78 (0.41, 1.47) |
Year¶ | — | 1.09 (1.00, 1.19) | — | 0.98 (0.92, 1.04) | — | 0.88 (0.83, 0.94) |
City homicide rate** | — | 1.10 (1.01, 1.20) | — | 1.12 (1.03, 1.23) | — | 1.12 (1.06, 1.19) |
- *Rate ratio of taxicab driver homicide rates post-installation versus pre-installation of cameras.
- †Rate ratio of taxicab driver homicide rates in camera cities compared to control cities.
- §Rate ratio of taxicab driver homicide rates in partition cities compared to control cities.
- ¶The rate ratio represents an associated change in taxicab driver homicide rate for every increase of 1 year.
- **The rate ratio represents an associated increase in taxicab driver homicide rate for every 1 unit increase in city homicide rate.